I agree with the idea laid out in this bill. If a private landowner wishes to open up his land to the public then they should be able to. The idea of not being held responsible for what happens on his land is to be determined. If he/she is receiving some kind of income form the land then yes. However, if they merely have a park open to the public, and the incident is not the fault of the landowner, then no, I do not believe they should be held responsible for the actions of others.